Sets, Fractals, Whatever You Want to Call Them

In summary: The set of “existence” contains the set of “observed existence”. The set of “observed existence” may include less elements than the set of existence, or it may include the same number of elements (i.e. they are the same set). We set of “observed existence” contains the set of “human perceived existence”, and likewise the contained set may contain equal or less elements than the set that contains it (as well as the set that contains that set). Exceedingly simple. 

The one and only question are these all sets that contain more subsets and are contained by broader sets, or are they all the same set? What is the set of all sets? Think Mandelbrot Fractals. It is just that simple, and that complex. The inclusion of fancy and irrelevant words just complicates the story in an unnecessary and meaningless way - that is, if you assume they’re just elements of (part of) a set.

But in the end, anything is just a way of trying to make sense of things - a theory, no more, and no less - please, please don’t confuse a theory with what is or could be, don’t you realize how meaningless and at the same time all-meaningful that is?